Equality 9 Trial Exposes Double Layer of Discrimination

San Diego City Attorney Trudges Forward In LGBT Free Speech Case

Equality Nine Trial Attempts Jury Selection All Day Monday, Opening Arguments May Be Delayed Due to New Circumstances

SAN DIEGO, May 1, 2012 — Nine marriage equality activists, now known as the “Equality Nine”, charged with misdemeanors from an August 19, 2010 peaceful “sit-in” protest will be in court again Tuesday morning. Jury selection began in their case Monday, April 30, at 10 a.m. before Judge Joan P. Weber in at the San Diego County Superior Court, 220 West Broadway, in downtown San Diego. The opening arguments, scheduled to begin on Tuesday morning, may be delayed due to emerging circumstances. Hearing at 830 a.m. will likely outline new LGBT [Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender] justice ramifications of this trial.

The City Attorney’s office has indicated that they are issuing subpoenas and flying witnesses in from as far away as Florida to press their case. “Its shocking, at a time of such budget cuts, that the City Attorney Jan Goldsmith is continuing to press these charges, its too costly to play these ego games on the City’s dime.” said Ann Menasche, a member of the San Diego Alliance for Marriage Equality (SAME), “Furthermore, its important that people maintain the freedom to protest peacefully in order to preserve our democracy”. Many agree with Menasche, over three thousand people have related their support for the Equality 9 or sent messages to the City Attorney urging him to drop the charges though petitions or letters.

The Equality Nine are being charged with two misdemeanors each: failure to disperse, and interference with the business of a public agency. The latter charge is based on California Penal Code section 602.1b, a law which contains a clause which states “Section b shall not apply to any person on the premises who is engaging in activities protected by the California Constitution or the Constitution of the United States.” Judge Weber has refused to allow this issue at trial, but the question of whether a law that specifically exempts constitutionally protected free speech from its application is likely to be a major issue in any future appeals.

Though Proposition 8 was ruled unconstitutional in a landmark federal case, it was, as still is, in effect due to a Ninth Circuit Court stay. On the day of their arrest, community members came to the County Clerk’s office with three same-sex couples who intended to request marriage licenses. One of the couples, Tony and Tyler Dylan-Hyde, who had booked an appointment to get married that day arrived with legal arguments explaining why, in their view, the County Clerk could marry them despite the stay. When they arrived at the clerk’s office though, they were blocked from even entering. An hour later the group was confronted by 50 San Diego County Sheriff’s deputies in full riot gear; ultimately nine SAME members were arrested.

Many wonder about the City Attorney’s agenda in prosecuting these protesters. Jose Medina, another member of SAME asks “Why is the city wasting public money and time prosecuting people engaged in peaceful protest for LGBT equality? Peaceful protest is a protected right under the US Constitution! I looking forward to hearing the reason why the sheriffs felt they had a right to interfere with the constitutional rights of these people”.

Though Monday trial proceedings took place in the Presiding Department, Tuesday’s hearing will begin in Judge Weber’s courtroom at Department 51. All media is invited to request recording privileges at the start of trial at 830AM.

About qlfadmin

Queer Liberation Front: Fighting for full human rights everywhere using non-violent direct action and other forms of activism. Join us in building a world free from trans-/homo-phobia, sexism, racism, classism, imperialism, militarism and other oppressions.
This entry was posted in marriage equality. Bookmark the permalink.